Commit e5fc6611 can potentially cause rq->max_idle_balance_cost to not be
updated, even when load_balance(NEWLY_IDLE) is attempted and the per-sd
max cost value is updated.

Preeti noticed a similar issue with updating rq->next_balance.

In this patch, we fix this by making sure we still check/update those values
even if a task gets enqueued while browsing the domains.

Cc: daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
Cc: alex....@linaro.org   
Cc: efa...@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guit...@linaro.org
Cc: morten.rasmus...@arm.com
Cc: as...@hp.com
Cc: mi...@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.l...@hp.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index af47873..e0f3019 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6658,6 +6658,7 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
        int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
 
        idle_enter_fair(this_rq);
+
        /*
         * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
         * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
@@ -6714,14 +6715,16 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
 
        raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
 
+       if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost)
+               this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost;
+
        /*
-        * While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock.
-        * A task could have be enqueued in the meantime
+        * While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock, a task could
+        * have been enqueued in the meantime. Since we're not going idle,
+        * pretend we pulled a task.
         */
-       if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task) {
+       if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task)
                pulled_task = 1;
-               goto out;
-       }
 
        if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) {
                /*
@@ -6731,9 +6734,6 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
                this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
        }
 
-       if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost)
-               this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost;
-
 out:
        /* Is there a task of a high priority class? */
        if (this_rq->nr_running != this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to