On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:33:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:19:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > perf_counter tools: Propagate signals properly > > > commit f7b7c26e01e51fe46097e11f179dc71ce7950084 > > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> > > > Date: Wed Jun 10 15:55:59 2009 +0200 > > > > > > but I dont think we need to do that > > > > But but but, then you're re-introducing that fail again? That no good. > > The thing is, just the return value is not sufficient to determine if > the child was interrupted. > > See WAIT(2), things like WIFSIGNALED() will not work when you just > propagate the return value, you need to terminate the task with a > signal to propagate this. >
cool, I just asked this in another email ;-) thanks jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
