Alexey Dobriyan schrieb: > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 21:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>+ addr = sg_dma_address(sg); >>+ *(u64 *)prd = cpu_to_le64(addr); > > > *(__le64 *) prd > > >>+ prd += sizeof(u64); > > >>+ len = sg_dma_len(sg); >>+ *(u32 *)prd = cpu_to_le32(len); > > > *(__le32 *) prd If I am not totally mistaken this is not gcc4 friendly code. (lvalue thing...) Wouldn't it be better to prevent double patching? -- Prakash Punnoor formerly known as Prakash K. Cheemplavam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
