2014-04-28 21:40 GMT+08:00 Matt Porter <mpor...@linaro.org>: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: >> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init() >> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664 >> > platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence >> > that is required. Fix this by checking that a matching OF ID is present >> > before calling l2x0_of_init(). >> > >> > Reported-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@linaro.org> >> > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mpor...@linaro.org> >> > --- >> > Applies against next-20140424 to fix the issue introduced in >> > 50655e6 ARM: l2c: prima2: remove cache size override >> >> Err, this only "fixes" it because it effectively disables the L2 cache >> _entirely_ - in the above commit, I kill your private compatible strings. >> >> This doesn't make sense. If the cache is already enabled, then the L2C >> code won't try to enable it again. > > Ok, please suggest an alternative. You merged this commit..it looks like > it had no ack from the platform maintainer..and I don't have hardware. > The commit is wrong, we can't have every platform executing sirfsoc's > l2x0_of_init() call/parameters by having this stuff in an early initcall > like that. > > It would be pretty straightforward to add those private compatibles > back so the approach works. If not, we need to move this to > .init_machine where it's guaranteed to only run on sirfsoc.
these has been one V1 patch at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/316312 my v2 has moved to init_irq() as Russell's suggestion. > > -Matt -barry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/