On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com> > wrote: >> nvc0_graph_ctor() would only let the graphics engine be enabled if its >> oclass has a proper microcode linked to it. This prevents GR from being >> enabled at all on chips that rely exclusively on external firmware, even >> though such a use-case is valid. >> >> Relax the conditions enabling the GR engine to also include the case >> where an external firmware has also been loaded. > I'm happy to take this patch as-is. I do wonder if we should do > something like this though: > > if (nouveau_boolopt(device->cfgopt, "NvGrUseFW", oclass->fecs.ucode == NULL)) > > Which will automatically switch to external firmware if there's no > internal implementation available. > > Thoughts? This could be a separate patch even, if preferred.
Sure, that should work. Do you mind if I come with a follow-up patch for this so I don't have to re-sent the current patch series? Since this is the only comment it received so far. Thanks, Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
