> Two questions: 1) This changes the interface for consumers of
> /proc/[pid]/status data, do we care?  Adding new line like this should be
> safe enough.

As far as I can tell, noone fretted about the addition of Threads:,
ShdPnd:, etc., which were not always there.

> 2) Perhaps we should do /proc/[pid]/rlimit/ type dir for each value?
>    This has been asked for before.

Is the request to see the limit settings, or the current usage, or both?
What kind of format are you suggesting?  I don't see a need for something
with a million little files.  Also, for some of the limits the correct
current usage count is not trivial to ascertain.  (And for others like
RLIMIT_FSIZE and RLIMIT_CORE, it is of course not meaningful at all.)


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to