On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:29:22AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > There should be no references to it any more and a parallel mark should
> > not be reordered against us. Use non-locked varient to clear page active.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgor...@suse.de>
> > ---
> >  mm/swap.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> > index f2228b7..7a5bdd7 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr, bool 
> > cold)
> >             }
> >  
> >             /* Clear Active bit in case of parallel mark_page_accessed */
> > -           ClearPageActive(page);
> > +           __ClearPageActive(page);
> 
> Shouldn't this comment be removed also?

Why? We're still clearing the active bit.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to