On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 20:21 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
>> +
>> +static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *owner;
>> + bool on_cpu = true;
>> +
>> + if (need_resched())
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + owner = ACCESS_ONCE(sem->owner);
>> + if (owner)
>> + on_cpu = owner->on_cpu;
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have
>> + * just acquired it and not set the owner yet or the mutex
>
> Nitpick. Change the above 2 mutex in comment to rwsem.
On that note, we may also change "lock->owner" to "sem->owner" for consistency.
Thanks,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
