On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:00:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 03:20:00PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Is it supposed to work?
> >
> > Why the hell not?  Same as opening a device node on r/o filesystem for
> > write, or doing the same with FIFO.
> 
> You can't bind a socket on a read-only fs, so I thought it was a fair 
> question.
> 
> I'll write a patch to add MS_NOIPCCONNECT and MNT_NOIPCCONNECT to
> block connect on unix sockets and open on fifos.  This will be useful
> for sandboxes that want to prevent sandboxed programs from accessing
> undesirable parts of the outside world.

Sigh...  Don't expose those FIFOs et.al. to them, then.
mount --bind /dev/null <pathname>
as part of setting the sucker up.  And if you *are* blindly exposing the
host filesystems to them wholesale, sockets and fifos are the least of your
problems, even if you do that read-only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to