On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:08:58PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > /** > + * worker_unbind_pool() - unbind the worker from the pool > + * @worker: worker which is bound to its pool > + * > + * Undo the pool-binding which had been done in create_worker() > + */ > +static void worker_unbind_pool(struct worker *worker)
worker_unbind_from_pool() would be a better name but I don't think using bind/unbind for this purpose is a good idea. We already use that pair of verbs for workers/pools being bound and unbound to CPUs. I don't think we want to overload the terms for this purpose. It gets pretty confusing. How about something like worker_detach_from_pool() and later worker_attach_to_pool()? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
