On 05/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 05/05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > Does the patch below cover it?
>
> Yes, thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>

Yes, but please consider the cleanup below, on top of your change.

This is subjective of course, but imho the code looks better without
the extra unlock/restore inside the loop.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH] signal: Simplify __lock_task_sighand()

__lock_task_sighand() does local_irq_save() to prevent the potential
deadlock, we can use preempt_disable() with the same effect. And in
this case we can do preempt_disable/enable + rcu_read_lock/unlock only
once outside of the main loop and simplify the code. Also shaves 112
bytes from signal.o.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c |   31 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 4368370..03a0fd4 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1260,30 +1260,25 @@ struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct 
task_struct *tsk,
                                           unsigned long *flags)
 {
        struct sighand_struct *sighand;
-
+       /*
+        * We are going to do rcu_read_unlock() under spin_lock_irqsave().
+        * Make sure we can not be preempted after rcu_read_unlock(), see
+        * rcu_read_unlock comment header for details.
+        */
+       preempt_disable();
+       rcu_read_lock();
        for (;;) {
-               /*
-                * Disable interrupts early to avoid deadlocks.
-                * See rcu_read_unlock comment header for details.
-                */
-               local_irq_save(*flags);
-               rcu_read_lock();
                sighand = rcu_dereference(tsk->sighand);
-               if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
-                       rcu_read_unlock();
-                       local_irq_restore(*flags);
+               if (unlikely(sighand == NULL))
                        break;
-               }
 
-               spin_lock(&sighand->siglock);
-               if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand)) {
-                       rcu_read_unlock();
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&sighand->siglock, *flags);
+               if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand))
                        break;
-               }
-               spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
-               rcu_read_unlock();
-               local_irq_restore(*flags);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sighand->siglock, *flags);
        }
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+       preempt_enable();
 
        return sighand;
 }
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to