On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 08:26 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > If we'd got to it earlier, yes. But 2.6.11 looks to be just a day or > > two away, and we've no idea why zap_pte_range or clear_page_range > > would have reverted. Nor have we heard from Ingo yet. > > It's also not clear that the patch completely fixes the copy_pte_range > latency. This trace is from the Athlon XP.
Then we need Ingo to investigate and explain all these reversions. I'm not _blaming_ Ingo for them, but I'm not familiar with his patches nor with deciphering latency traces - he's the magician around here. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
