On Wed, May 07 2014, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 6 May 2014 19:22:43 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Memory compaction works by having a "freeing scanner" scan from one end of a 
>> zone which isolates pages as migration targets while another "migrating 
>> scanner" 
>> scans from the other end of the same zone which isolates pages for migration.
>> 
>> When page migration fails for an isolated page, the target page is returned 
>> to 
>> the system rather than the freelist built by the freeing scanner.  This may 
>> require the freeing scanner to continue scanning memory after suitable 
>> migration 
>> targets have already been returned to the system needlessly.
>> 
>> This patch returns destination pages to the freeing scanner freelist when 
>> page 
>> migration fails.  This prevents unnecessary work done by the freeing scanner 
>> but 
>> also encourages memory to be as compacted as possible at the end of the zone.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Greg Thelen <[email protected]>
>
> What did Greg actually report?  IOW, what if any observable problem is
> being fixed here?

I detected the problem at runtime seeing that ext4 metadata pages (esp
the ones read by "sbi->s_group_desc[i] = sb_bread(sb, block)") were
constantly visited by compaction calls of migrate_pages().  These pages
had a non-zero b_count which caused fallback_migrate_page() ->
try_to_release_page() -> try_to_free_buffers() to fail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to