On Tue 2014-05-06 11:59:41, David Miller wrote:
> From: j...@joshtriplett.org
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:57:03 -0700
>
> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:23:27PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org>
> >> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 05:21:14 +0200
> >>
> >> > What parts would you remove to get the foot print down for a 2MB
> >> > single purpose machine?
> >>
> >> I wouldn't use Linux, end of story.
> >>
> >> Maybe two decades ago, but not now, those days are over.
> >
> > That's a self-fulfilling prophecy:
>
> Making 2MB RAM machines today makes no sense at all.
>
> The lowest end dirt cheap smartphone, something which fits on
> someone's pocket, has gigabytes of ram.
Low end smartphone is quite high-end device :-). It only has to run for
few days on big battery.
I have programmable watch with <64K RAM. Yes, that one runs for months on
battery.
> The only entity looking backwards are the people making these
> improperly provisioned systems.
There's nothing improper about small ammount of RAM to save power.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
