Hi guys, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:19:57PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:54:29 +0900 > AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > Please add a bit more to the change log. Like what you did. Something > like: > > ---- > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have pretty much the same > definitions of CALLER_ADDRx(n). Instead of duplicating the code for all > the archs, define a ftrace_return_address0() and > ftrace_return_address(n) that can be overwritten by the archs if they > need to do something different. Instead of 7 macros in every arch, we > now only have at most 2 (and actually only 1 as > ftrace_return_address0() should be the same for all archs). > > The CALLER_ADDRx(n) will now be defined in linux/ftrace.h and use the > ftrace_return_address*(n?) macros. This removes a lot of the duplicate > code. > ----- > > Use that if you want :-)
Akashi: did you get around to posting a new version of this patch? We can't take your arm64 patches until you get the core stuff merged... Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
