On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 01:05:59 AM Zheng, Lv wrote: > Hi, > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 8:09 AM > > > > On Monday, May 12, 2014 08:51:36 AM Zheng, Lv wrote: > > > Hi, Rafael > > > > > > I checked the bug. > > > > > > The dmesg of the kernel without the bisected commit: > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): Incorrect checksum in table > > > [XSDT] - 0xA0, should be 0xC9 (20140214/tbprint-218) > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI Warning: 32/64 FACS address mismatch in FADT - two > > > FACS tables! (20140214/tbfadt-395) > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): 32/64X FACS address mismatch in > > > FADT - 0xCF661F40/0x00000000CF667E40, using 32 > > (20140214/tbfadt-522) > > > > > > The dmesg of the kernel with the bisected commit: > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): Incorrect checksum in table > > > [XSDT] - 0xA0, should be 0xC9 (20131218/tbprint-214) > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): 32/64X FACS address mismatch in > > > FADT: 0xCF661F40/0x00000000CF667E40, using 64-bit > > address (20131218/tbfadt-271) > > > > > > This is the purpose of the bisected commit. > > > According to the link below: > > > http://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=885 > > > And Windows documentation: > > > http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/b/9/5b97017b-e28a-4bae-ba48-174cf47d23cd/CPA002_WH06.ppt > > > We believe 64-bit addresses should be used by default so that new > > > features can be enabled according to the public knowledge of > > Windows Vista+ behavior. > > > For old Windows, it's hard for us to guess, we should wait for the > > > reports and add quirks for them. > > > > > > Thus this commit is not wrong, it shouldn't be reverted. > > > > It is wrong, because it breaks a system that worked without it. > > > > It's *that* simple. > > For this commit, we knew there would be systems broken. > And was prepared to add quirks for them. > The quirks are not there just because we rely on end users to report. > > > > > And either you have a fix for that (which is not a quirk, because there may > > be > > more machines like that), or we have to revert it. > > > > > Though this platform is newer than vista, we still should offer a quirk > > > mechanism > > > for it as a quick fix: > > > > We didn't need a quirk for it before, though. > > But according to BZ885, we need more quirks for other machines before. > For example, ThinkPad 40e and ThinkPad 51e reported in the BZ885. > > > > > So really, I'm reverting it. > > OK. > I'll first try to figure out the cause of the issue that is happening to > Intel DP45SG. > And then try this approach again in a smarter way that is more tolerant > torward the possible regressions.
Great, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
