On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:34:12PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:48:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:11:39PM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:25:20PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > The reaction of kvm-recheck.sh is obscure at best, and easy to miss
> > > > completely. This commit therefore prints "BUG: Build failed" in the
> > > > summary at the end of a run.
> > >
> > > This commit also changes a dozen other things about the output that this
> > > commit message does not document. :)
> >
> > Well, I don't know about a dozen, but I did upgrade the commit message to
> > read as follows:
> >
> > The reaction of kvm-recheck.sh is obscure at best, and easy to
> > miss completely. This commit therefore prints "BUG: Build failed"
> > in the summary at the end of a run. This commit also adds the
> > line of dashes in cases where performance info is not available,
> > and also avoids printing nonsense diagnostics in cases where
> > some of the normal test output is not available.
>
> What about the change to kvm-test-1-run.sh?
Right you are!
The reaction of kvm-recheck.sh is obscure at best, and easy to
miss completely. This commit therefore prints "BUG: Build failed"
in the summary at the end of a run. This commit also adds the
line of dashes in cases where performance info is not available,
and also avoids printing nonsense diagnostics in cases where
some of the normal test output is not available. In addition,
this commit saves off the .config file even when the build fails.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
