On Tue, 13 May 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:00:09 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Good points -- I was indeed thinking about stress testing instead of
> > algorithmic testing.
>
> But doesn't lockdep use algorithmic tests too?
Kinda, but only for the deadlock detection.
I'm not sure if we want to inflict PI correctness and set_scheduler()
interaction to lockdep.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
