On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 09:25, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-02-28 09:10 [..] > > To justify writting the new code, I am assuming someone has actually sat > > down and in the minimal stuck their finger in the air > > and said "yes, there is definetely wind there". > > I did, not for this problem though. The code this idea comes from sends > batched events
I would bet the benefit you are seeing has to do with batching rather than such an optimization flag. Different ballgame. I relooked at their code snippet, they dont even have skbs built nor even figured out what sock or PID. That work still needs to be done it seems in cn_netlink_send(). So probably all they need to do is move the check in cn_netlink_send() instead. This is assuming they are not scratching their heads with some realted complexities. I am gonna disapear for a while; hopefully the original posters have gathered some ideas from what we discussed. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
