On 05/16/2014 10:51 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:49:21PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> so I was staring at >> >> 12544697f12e ("x86_64: be less annoying on boot, v2") >> >> and how naked numbers mean sh*t and how I have to grep sources to find >> out what this 10 thing means. So how about the following cleanup? We can >> do it this way, we can do accessors and stuff, whatever. But the naked >> numbers are plain misleading. >> >> So how about it? I'm asking whether it makes sense first before I go >> and replace all tests of console_loglevel with naked numbers around the >> tree. >> >> Thanks. >> >> --- >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c >> index 068054f4bf20..0029d974e431 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c >> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init >> x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data) >> */ >> load_ucode_bsp(); >> >> - if (console_loglevel == 10) >> + if (console_loglevel >= CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_QUIET) > > That's CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_DEBUG, of course. > > See, misleading. :-P >
Absolutely. I'll ack it with that change. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/