On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 08:22:58PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-set.c
> b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-set.c
> index a416de8..4e2f35a 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-set.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpufreq-set.c
> @@ -320,12 +320,11 @@ int cmd_freq_set(int argc, char **argv)
>
> printf(_("Setting cpu: %d\n"), cpu);
> ret = do_one_cpu(cpu, &new_pol, freq, policychange);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + print_error();
> break;
Just return directly instead of break return;
> + }
> }
>
> - if (ret)
> - print_error();
> -
> return ret;
Are you sure this patch is correct? Theoretically, it's possible to
reach the end of this function without going hitting the
"ret = do_one_cpu(...);" assignment.
Don't be fooled by the "int ret = 0;" initialization, that is a trick
initialization to mislead the unwary. By the end of the do while loop
then "ret" is always -1.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
