Hello Joe
OK, then I will use dev_vdbg. Thanks! On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 21:33 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >> I think dev_vdg cannot be controlled with DYNAMIC_DEBUG, therefore I >> replaced it with dev_dbg. >> >> But if you prefer to use dev_dbg, I will modify it to use dev_dbg > > s/VDEBUG/dev_vdbg/ > > dev_vdbg can be controlled by DYNAMIC_DEBUG. > > dev_vdbg is dev_dbg when VERBOSE_DEBUG is set. > > include/linux/device.h-#ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG > include/linux/device.h:#define dev_vdbg dev_dbg > include/linux/device.h-#else > include/linux/device.h:#define dev_vdbg(dev, format, arg...) > \ > include/linux/device.h-({ > \ > include/linux/device.h- if (0) > \ > include/linux/device.h- dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, dev, format, ##arg); > \ > include/linux/device.h- 0; > \ > include/linux/device.h-}) > > -- Ricardo Ribalda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/