Hello Joe
OK, then I will use dev_vdbg. Thanks!
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 21:33 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>> I think dev_vdg cannot be controlled with DYNAMIC_DEBUG, therefore I
>> replaced it with dev_dbg.
>>
>> But if you prefer to use dev_dbg, I will modify it to use dev_dbg
>
> s/VDEBUG/dev_vdbg/
>
> dev_vdbg can be controlled by DYNAMIC_DEBUG.
>
> dev_vdbg is dev_dbg when VERBOSE_DEBUG is set.
>
> include/linux/device.h-#ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG
> include/linux/device.h:#define dev_vdbg dev_dbg
> include/linux/device.h-#else
> include/linux/device.h:#define dev_vdbg(dev, format, arg...)
> \
> include/linux/device.h-({
> \
> include/linux/device.h- if (0)
> \
> include/linux/device.h- dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, dev, format, ##arg);
> \
> include/linux/device.h- 0;
> \
> include/linux/device.h-})
>
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
