20.05.2014, 04:00, "Peter Zijlstra" <pet...@infradead.org>:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:31:19PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
>> @@ -513,9 +513,17 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct
>> hrtimer *timer)
>> struct
>> sched_dl_entity,
>> dl_timer);
>> struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
>> - struct rq *rq = task_rq(p);
>> + struct rq *rq;
>> +again:
>> + rq = task_rq(p);
>> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
>>
>> + if (unlikely(rq != task_rq(p))) {
>> + /* Task was moved, retrying. */
>> + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>> + goto again;
>> + }
>> +
>
> That thing is called: rq = __task_rq_lock(p);
But p->pi_lock is not held. The problem is __task_rq_lock() has lockdep assert.
Should we change it?
Kirill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
