Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > +#define ATOMIC_OPS(op) ATOMIC_OP(op) ATOMIC_OP_RETURN(op)
Can ATOMIC_OP() just be an alias for ATOMIC_OP_RETURN() where that is appropriate? I suspect several arches (MN10300 included) are going to return the value *anyway*. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
