Hi!
> > Yes, the patch is very ugly. If something like this needs to be done,
> > then perhaps acpi should properly register into driver model and do
> > the work there. This will also mean code will be called consistently.
>
> I totally agree. Do you have an example of how a non-device
> can do this?
>
> In particular something that gets as close to shutting down
> the system devices as possible. But gets called before that.
>
> Or perhaps acpi should simply be setup to be the first system device?
I believe that's the prefered solution.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
