Hi, On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:08:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Sebastian Reichel <s...@kernel.org> [140521 14:51]: > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:45:28PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Right. The only documentation of the SSI module is existing > > code sent by Carlos / included in the maemo kernel. > > That's probably better than any documentation though :)
Both have their advantages. Just with the code its hard to add features like context loss checks. > > > > It's probably something with the sysc or idlemodes that > > > > keeps things from idling. Maybe wrong address? Or wrong > > > > flags? I'm pretty sure it was the first .dts patch out of > > > > these two as the second one alone did not apply. > > > > > > Hmm yeah below is probably how it should be, does this > > > work for you? With this fix applied and your ssi dts > > > patches n900 keeps hitting off-idle for me. > > > > I can confirm, that the N900 hits idle states when the DT > > patch and the hwmod patch is applied. I have not actually > > tested if it also works without your hwmod patch. > > > > There are still problems with the idle state if the driver is > > actually loaded (and I see 100% runtime pm usage in powertop), > > but that can be fixed later. > > > > Feel free to add Tested-by/Acked-By to the hwmod patch. > > OK thanks for testing. You are welcome. > I'll apply your dts changes as soon as I have an ack from Paul on > the hwmod changes. Probably best to queue them together to avoid > PM breaking. Ok. Sounds legit. -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
