Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:18:56AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:55:29 GMT, Russell King said: > > > The PCI updates change the prototype of a helper function for > > > pci_bus_alloc_resource(), but don't touch the actual helper function > > > in PCMCIA. > > > > That explains the warning messages that gcc was tossing, which I suspected > > was > > involved... > > > > > This means that the PCI update is actually broken - if it's merged as > > > is into Linus' tree, PCMCIA will break there as well. > > > > Is the patch made to PCI actually incorrect, or is the proper way to do this > > to propagate the changes into the relevant PCMCIA code? > > PCI has been updated to accept 64-bit resources, but the PCMCIA code > has been missed. So the correct fix is to propagate the changes where > necessary into the PCMCIA code.
hmm, I missed that. That's the price of two screenfuls of fscking compile warnings. > The minimalist solution is to fix up the PCMCIA alignment functions. Greg's dropping the 64-bit-resource patch for now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
