On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:24:19AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > There are two checks for CONFIG_SIBYTE_BCM1480_PROF in the tree since > v2.6.15. The related Kconfig symbol has never been added to the tree. So > these checks have always evaluated to false. Besides, one of these > checks guards a call of sbprof_cpu_intr(). But that function is not > defined. Remove all this. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <[email protected]> > --- > Untested. > > Until v2.6.23 there also were checks for CONFIG_SIBYTE_SB1250_PROF in > the tree. There also was a Kconfig symbol SIBYTE_SB1250_PROF so it was > possible to make these checks evaluate to true. But, since one of these > checks also guarded a call of sbprof_cpu_intr(), that should have made > the build fail with an error.
The Sibyte profiling was far inferior to later solutions such as oprofile or perf and non-standard anyway. So let's kill what's left over. Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
