There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
---
fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
index 599eb4c..6a8e3c8 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
@@ -902,11 +902,13 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extents(struct
ocfs2_move_extents_context *context)
struct inode *inode = context->inode;
struct ocfs2_dinode *di;
struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
- struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
+ struct ocfs2_super *osb;
if (!inode)
return -ENOENT;
+ osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
+
if (ocfs2_is_hard_readonly(osb) || ocfs2_is_soft_readonly(osb))
return -EROFS;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
