On 23 May 2014 17:11, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:06:27PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> On 23 May 2014 16:44, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> > Should be clk_prepare_enable() and similarly for the disable and you
>> > should check the error codes but yes, that looks good.
>
>> I was planning to keep clk_prepare/clk_unprepare in probe/remove.
>
> Why - what purpose would it serve to leave the clock prepared but not
> enabled?

I was getting some kernel slow path warning initially while preparing
this code, but not able to reproduce that warning now.

-- 
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to