Hi Vincent,
Why do we have two interfaces arch_scale_freq_power() and
arch_scale_cpu_power()? Does it make sense to consolidate them now ?
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Use the new arch_scale_cpu_power in order to reflect the original capacity of
> a CPU instead of arch_scale_freq_power which is more linked to a scaling of
> the capacity linked to the frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 71e1fec..6cc25a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> */
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale);
>
> -unsigned long arch_scale_freq_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> +unsigned long arch_scale_cpu_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> {
> return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);
> }
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpu)
> set_power_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity);
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: update cpu_power %lu\n",
> - cpu, arch_scale_freq_power(NULL, cpu));
> + cpu, arch_scale_cpu_power(NULL, cpu));
> }
>
> #else
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
