Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1]$ grep PG_arch fs/reiser4/*.c
>> fs/reiser4/page_cache.c: page_flag_name(page, PG_arch_1),
>> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c: assert("vs-1448",
>> test_and_clear_bit(PG_arch_1, &node->pg->flags));
>> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c: ON_DEBUG(set_bit(PG_arch_1,
>> &(copy->pg)->flags));
>>
>> Someone was obviously smoking something illegal, what part of 'arch'
>> did she/he not understand? I assume we can request this is fixed by
>> the patch owner asap.
>>
>
> Could the reiserfs team please comment?
>
> If it's just debug then probably it would be better to add a new flag.
>
Yes, this is debugging. I believe it can be removed now.
> If these pages are never mmapped then it'll just happen to work, I guess.
> But a filesystem really shouldn't be dinking with PG_arch_1.
Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
