On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:40:17PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > Hej Jesper!
Tjo! > But in several other place in the feature ensures that main_mtd is not NULL. > (That's what cppcheck base their misjudgment on too) > > Then all these checks are unnecessary? No, it is still necessary to check for NULL, however as I wrote in my reply, we do check for ptable_head, which is only set if main_mtd is set. > You should know, looks like you've written most of the code in 2007 :) > > Best regards > Rickard Strandqvist /Jesper > 2014-05-23 9:00 GMT+02:00 Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nils...@axis.com>: > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:00:09AM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > >> Cleaning up inconsistent NULL checks. > >> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference. > >> > >> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. > > > > ... and is a false positive. > > > > We can't enter this if-block unless ptable_head is set, > > which is only set if main_mtd is set. > > > > It might be useful to add it anyways, but there's a refactoring > > needed for the axisflashmaps, so I'll keep it for then. > > > > /^JN - Jesper Nilsson > > -- > > Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nils...@axis.com /^JN - Jesper Nilsson -- Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nils...@axis.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/