On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 02:29:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become
> more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another
> routine
> __target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional
> impact.
>
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
I guess I can take this one without the rest of the series?
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 56
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index a05c921..ae11dd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1816,12 +1816,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
> * GOVERNORS *
> *********************************************************************/
>
> +static int __target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table, int index)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> + int retval = -EINVAL;
> + bool notify;
> +
> + notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
> +
> + if (notify) {
> + freqs.old = policy->cur;
> + freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
> + freqs.flags = 0;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
> + __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
> +
> + cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
> + }
> +
> + retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
> + if (retval)
> + pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n", __func__,
> + retval);
> +
> + if (notify)
> + cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, retval);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq,
> unsigned int relation)
> {
> - int retval = -EINVAL;
> unsigned int old_target_freq = target_freq;
> + int retval = -EINVAL;
>
> if (cpufreq_disabled())
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1848,8 +1879,6 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy,
> retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
> else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> - bool notify;
> int index;
>
> freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
> @@ -1870,26 +1899,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION);
> -
> - if (notify) {
> - freqs.old = policy->cur;
> - freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
> - freqs.flags = 0;
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
> - __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
> -
> - cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
> - }
> -
> - retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
> - if (retval)
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
> - __func__, retval);
> -
> - if (notify)
> - cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, retval);
> + retval = __target_index(policy, freq_table, index);
> }
>
> out:
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
