Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kiran Kumar Raparthy
<kiran.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: "hyungseoung.yoo" <hyungseoung....@samsung.com>
>
> Preserve the master role when SCO or eSCO is active
> as this improves compatability with lots of
> headset and chipset combinations.
>
> This is one of the number of patches from the Android AOSP
> common.git tree, which is used on almost all Android devices.
> It looks like it would improve support for compatibility with
> lot of headset,so I wanted to submit it for review to see
> if it should go upstream.
>
> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org> (maintainer:BLUETOOTH SUBSYSTEM)
> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org> (maintainer:BLUETOOTH SUBSYSTEM)
> Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedb...@gmail.com> (maintainer:BLUETOOTH SUBSYSTEM)
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL])
> Cc: linux-blueto...@vger.kernel.org (open list:BLUETOOTH SUBSYSTEM)
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL])
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-t...@android.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: hyungseoung.yoo <hyungseoung....@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaikumar Ganesh <jaikum...@android.com>
> [kiran: Added context to commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Raparthy <kiran.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 15010a2..6f944d5 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -1915,6 +1915,15 @@ unlock:
> hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_sco_active(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + if (hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, SCO_LINK, BT_CONNECTED) ||
> + (hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ESCO_LINK,
> + BT_CONNECTED)))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void hci_conn_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct hci_ev_conn_request *ev = (void *) skb->data;
> @@ -1961,7 +1970,8 @@ static void hci_conn_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &ev->bdaddr);
>
> - if (lmp_rswitch_capable(hdev) && (mask &
> HCI_LM_MASTER))
> + if (lmp_rswitch_capable(hdev) && ((mask &
> HCI_LM_MASTER)
> + || is_sco_active(hdev)))
> cp.role = 0x00; /* Become master */
> else
> cp.role = 0x01; /* Remain slave */
> --
> 1.8.2.1
I guess the real issue is the possibility of creating a scatternet if
you have more than one connection, I will send a patch for scatternet
shortly but that does not guarantee the remote device wont reject it.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
