3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Karl Heiss <khe...@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 8c2eab9097dba50bcd73ed4632baccc3f34857f9 ]

Don't transition to the PF state on every strike after 'Path.Max.Retrans'.
Per draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-03 Section 5.1.6:

   Additional (PMR - PFMR) consecutive timeouts on a PF destination
   confirm the path failure, upon which the destination transitions to the
   Inactive state.  As described in [RFC4960], the sender (i) SHOULD notify
   ULP about this state transition, and (ii) transmit heartbeats to the
   Inactive destination at a lower frequency as described in Section 8.3 of
   [RFC4960].

This also prevents sending SCTP_ADDR_UNREACHABLE to the user as the state
bounces between SCTP_INACTIVE and SCTP_PF for each subsequent strike.

Signed-off-by: Karl Heiss <khe...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -496,11 +496,10 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
 
        /* If the transport error count is greater than the pf_retrans
         * threshold, and less than pathmaxrtx, and if the current state
-        * is not SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, then mark this transport as Partially
-        * Failed, see SCTP Quick Failover Draft, section 5.1
+        * is SCTP_ACTIVE, then mark this transport as Partially Failed,
+        * see SCTP Quick Failover Draft, section 5.1
         */
-       if ((transport->state != SCTP_PF) &&
-          (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) &&
+       if ((transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
           (asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
           (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to