3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
[ Upstream commit 30313a3d5794472c3548d7288e306a5492030370 ]
When bridge device is created with IFLA_ADDRESS, we are not calling
br_stp_change_bridge_id(), which leads to incorrect local fdb
management and bridge id calculation, and prevents us from receiving
frames on the bridge device.
Reported-by: Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no>
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
@@ -445,6 +445,20 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb
return 0;
}
+static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
+ struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
+{
+ struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+ if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+ br_stp_change_bridge_id(br, nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]));
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
+ }
+
+ return register_netdevice(dev);
+}
+
static size_t br_get_link_af_size(const struct net_device *dev)
{
struct net_port_vlans *pv;
@@ -473,6 +487,7 @@ struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_
.priv_size = sizeof(struct net_bridge),
.setup = br_dev_setup,
.validate = br_validate,
+ .newlink = br_dev_newlink,
.dellink = br_dev_delete,
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
