On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:35:58PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> writes:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 04:56:45PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Before:
> >> gcc 4.8.2: virtio_blk: stack used = 392
> >> gcc 4.6.4: virtio_blk: stack used = 480
> >>
> >> After:
> >> gcc 4.8.2: virtio_blk: stack used = 408
> >> gcc 4.6.4: virtio_blk: stack used = 432
> >
> > Is it worth it to make the good compiler worse? People are going to use
> > the newer GCC more as time goes on anyhow.
>
> No, but it's only 16 bytes of stack loss for a simplicity win:
>
> virtio_ring.c | 120
> +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
I'm concerned that we are doing an extra descriptor walk now though.
And desc == &vq.desc at the end is kind of ugly too.
How about
if (indirect)
vq->vring.desc[i].next = i + 1;
else
i = vq->vring.desc[i].next;
or something like this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
