From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit 521c42990e9d561ed5ed9f501f07639d0512b3c9 upstream.
tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is
possible or not. It does this as the first check:
if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
return false;
Thats wrong. tick_check_percpu() returns true when the device is
useable. Check for false instead.
[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/486a02efe0246635aaba786e24b42d316438bf3b.1397537987.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
---
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 64522ecdfe0e..271ce26faa21 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device
*curdev,
bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
struct clock_event_device *newdev)
{
- if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
+ if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
return false;
return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
