Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
There isn't actual risk here, this variable is not used uninitialized AFAICS.
> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
It seems this is a false inference by the tool. I think the preferred method
to suppress false tool warnings is to use uninitialized_var.
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
> index bba6768..326c005 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ int t4_seeprom_wp(struct adapter *adapter, bool
> enable)
> */
> int get_vpd_params(struct adapter *adapter, struct vpd_params *p)
> {
> - u32 cclk_param, cclk_val;
> + u32 cclk_param, cclk_val = 0;
> int i, ret, addr;
> int ec, sn, pn;
> u8 *vpd, csum;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
