On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:13:22PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:35:16AM -0700, eric ernst wrote: > > On 14-05-30 01:48 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:26:44PM -0700, eric.er...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > >>From: Eric Ernst <eric.er...@linux.intel.com> > > >> > > >>For Baytrail, you should never set a GPIO set to direct_irq > > >>to output mode. When direct_irq_en is set for a GPIO, it is > > >>tied directly to an APIC internally, and making the pad output > > >>does not make any sense. Assert a WARN() in the event this happens. > > >Can't we just clear that flag when the GPIO is requested? Or is this > > >something which can't be done at this point? > > The IRQ setting for that register (the IRQ wiring via direct_irq_en) should > > be set statically on boot, and should not be changed, let alone allowing for > > multiple changes during runtime. > > OK. > > Please then follow the coding conventions documented in > Documentation/SubmittingPatches and also check that
Documentation/CodingStyle, that is. > scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't complain too much. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/