On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:55:42PM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:30:22AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > I nominate this as a candidate for linux-2.6.11 release branch. :) > > > > No. Unfortunately if you fix ppc64 here you will break ppc, and vice > > versa. Yes, we are going to reconcile the cur_cpu_spec definitions > > between ppc and ppc64. :) > > The proper fix is to get the cpu_has_feature patch merged up from -mm, > but that's 99% cleanup and 1% bugfix. So here's a more appropriate fix > for the 2.6.11 patch stream. This goes on top of the one that just got > merged there.
Applied, thanks. greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
