3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfie...@redhat.com>

commit 27b11428b7de097c42f205beabb1764f4365443b upstream.

The current code assumes a one-to-one lockowner<->lock stateid
correspondance.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4156,6 +4156,10 @@ static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nf
 
        if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
                return false;
+       if (list_empty(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids)) {
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+               return false;
+       }
        lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
                               struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
        return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to