3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

commit c243e96335c56e56dcf6a00593104554fb06b689 upstream.

If "vf_id" is smaller than hw->func_caps.vf_base_id then it leads to
an array underflow of the pf->vf[] array.  This is unlikely to happen
unless the hardware is bad, but it's a small change and it silences a
static checker warning.

Fixes: 7efa84b7abc1 ('i40e: support VFs on PFs other than 0')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Sibai Li <sibai...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ int i40e_vc_process_vf_msg(struct i40e_p
                           u32 v_retval, u8 *msg, u16 msglen)
 {
        struct i40e_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
-       int local_vf_id = vf_id - hw->func_caps.vf_base_id;
+       unsigned int local_vf_id = vf_id - hw->func_caps.vf_base_id;
        struct i40e_vf *vf;
        int ret;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to