3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedb...@intel.com>

commit 9eb1fbfa0a737fd4d3a6d12d71c5ea9af622b887 upstream.

Commit 1c2e004183178 introduced an event handler for the encryption key
refresh complete event with the intent of fixing some LE/SMP cases.
However, this event is shared with BR/EDR and there we actually want to
act only on the auth_complete event (which comes after the key refresh).

If we do not do this we may trigger an L2CAP Connect Request too early
and cause the remote side to return a security block error.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedb...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -3006,6 +3006,12 @@ static void hci_key_refresh_complete_evt
        if (!conn)
                goto unlock;
 
+       /* For BR/EDR the necessary steps are taken through the
+        * auth_complete event.
+        */
+       if (conn->type != LE_LINK)
+               goto unlock;
+
        if (!ev->status)
                conn->sec_level = conn->pending_sec_level;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to