3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> commit a8d22396302b7e4e5f0a594c1c1594388c29edaf upstream. The ACPI PNP subsystem returns errors from pnpacpi_set_resources() and pnpacpi_disable_resources() if the _SRS or _DIS methods are not present, respectively, but it should not do that, because those methods are optional. For this reason, modify pnpacpi_set_resources() and pnpacpi_disable_resources(), respectively, to ignore missing _SRS or _DIS. This problem has been uncovered by commit 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) and manifested itself by causing serial port suspend to fail on some systems. Fixes: 202317a573b2 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74371 Reported-by: wxg4net <wxg4...@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: <nonproffessio...@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c +++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c @@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ static int pnpacpi_set_resources(struct { struct acpi_device *acpi_dev; acpi_handle handle; - struct acpi_buffer buffer; - int ret; + int ret = 0; pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, "set resources\n"); @@ -97,19 +96,26 @@ static int pnpacpi_set_resources(struct if (WARN_ON_ONCE(acpi_dev != dev->data)) dev->data = acpi_dev; - ret = pnpacpi_build_resource_template(dev, &buffer); - if (ret) - return ret; - ret = pnpacpi_encode_resources(dev, &buffer); - if (ret) { + if (acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__SRS)) { + struct acpi_buffer buffer; + + ret = pnpacpi_build_resource_template(dev, &buffer); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = pnpacpi_encode_resources(dev, &buffer); + if (!ret) { + acpi_status status; + + status = acpi_set_current_resources(handle, &buffer); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + ret = -EIO; + } kfree(buffer.pointer); - return ret; } - if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_set_current_resources(handle, &buffer))) - ret = -EINVAL; - else if (acpi_bus_power_manageable(handle)) + if (!ret && acpi_bus_power_manageable(handle)) ret = acpi_bus_set_power(handle, ACPI_STATE_D0); - kfree(buffer.pointer); + return ret; } @@ -117,7 +123,7 @@ static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(str { struct acpi_device *acpi_dev; acpi_handle handle; - int ret; + acpi_status status; dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "disable resources\n"); @@ -128,13 +134,15 @@ static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(str } /* acpi_unregister_gsi(pnp_irq(dev, 0)); */ - ret = 0; if (acpi_bus_power_manageable(handle)) acpi_bus_set_power(handle, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD); - /* continue even if acpi_bus_set_power() fails */ - if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL))) - ret = -ENODEV; - return ret; + + /* continue even if acpi_bus_set_power() fails */ + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) + return -ENODEV; + + return 0; } #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
