3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.ha...@gmail.com>

commit 6c6c0d5a1c949d2e084706f9e5fb1fccc175b265 upstream.

If the last hrtimer interrupt detected a hang it sets hang_detected=1
and programs the clock event device with a delay to let the system
make progress.

If hang_detected == 1, we prevent reprogramming of the clock event
device in hrtimer_reprogram() but not in hrtimer_force_reprogram().

This can lead to the following situation:

hrtimer_interrupt()
   hang_detected = 1;
   program ce device to Xms from now (hang delay)

We have two timers pending:
   T1 expires 50ms from now
   T2 expires 5s from now

Now T1 gets canceled, which causes hrtimer_force_reprogram() to be
invoked, which in turn programs the clock event device to T2 (5
seconds from now).

Any hrtimer_start after that will not reprogram the hardware due to
hang_detected still being set. So we effectivly block all timers until
the T2 event fires and cleans up the hang situation.

Add a check for hang_detected to hrtimer_force_reprogram() which
prevents the reprogramming of the hang delay in the hardware
timer. The subsequent hrtimer_interrupt will resolve all outstanding
issues.

[ tglx: Rewrote subject and changelog and fixed up the comment in
        hrtimer_force_reprogram() ]

Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.ha...@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/53602dc6.2060...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/hrtimer.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -582,6 +582,23 @@ hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_c
 
        cpu_base->expires_next.tv64 = expires_next.tv64;
 
+       /*
+        * If a hang was detected in the last timer interrupt then we
+        * leave the hang delay active in the hardware. We want the
+        * system to make progress. That also prevents the following
+        * scenario:
+        * T1 expires 50ms from now
+        * T2 expires 5s from now
+        *
+        * T1 is removed, so this code is called and would reprogram
+        * the hardware to 5s from now. Any hrtimer_start after that
+        * will not reprogram the hardware due to hang_detected being
+        * set. So we'd effectivly block all timers until the T2 event
+        * fires.
+        */
+       if (cpu_base->hang_detected)
+               return;
+
        if (cpu_base->expires_next.tv64 != KTIME_MAX)
                tick_program_event(cpu_base->expires_next, 1);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to