On Iau, 2005-03-03 at 03:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which > is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an > official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on > linux.bkbits.net)
IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be. 2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is always cover on a security fix. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/