Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Am I right? All we're proposing here is a tree which has small fixups for > > reasonably serious problems. Almost without exception it would consist of > > backports. > > "thru-ports": commit to linux-2.6.x.y and get Linus to pull.
This means that for patches which didn't come through -mm, their first exposure in a public tree will be when they pop up in our "most stable" tree. That's backwards. However it should be manageable, as long as linux-release is constrained to obviously-correct and its-no-more-broken-now-than-it-used-to-be patches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
