On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 08:37:11PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 05/30/2014 08:10 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>>Hi Wolfram:
> >>>   Since this version resolved all comments, it's ok for you?
> >
> >Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought a V4 was needed, but it isn't. I'll
> >try to have a look this weekend.
> >
> OK. Thanks.

Sorry, I didn't manage to get a deeper look into this as I wanted. Let
me assure that your (and the other) ACPI changes have high priority for
the next release cycle.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to